Archives

Nordic Notes, February 2021

Scandinavian Textiles: Articles, Exhibits, News

Articles

Slitrya. Arianna E. Funk wrote about the traditions of rya and slitrya in Scandinavia for Handwoven magazine, November/December 2020. A short history of the technique is on the Handwoven website, focused on Sweden. In part, “Traditional rya can be split into two groups: bruksryor, practical textiles meant to be used, and prydnadsryor, decorative works that were painstakingly designed and displayed with the pile side up. Bruksrya are what we now call slitrya. In Swedish, slit can mean hard work as well as wear and tear…”

Exhibits

The Soft Galleri in Oslo features textile artists. On view from January 14-February 28 is embroidered work by Klara Pousette, a  Swedish artist working in Oslo. (Exhibit description here.) On her website is a surprising work from 2016–what you see behind the curtain of “Crystal Queen” is unexpected and amazing.

Vestfoldsmett: a Special Issue on a Historical Technique

Details on this Vestfoldteppe, the Tønsbergteppe, woven from 1800-1850, on digitaltmuseet.no here.

By Robbie LaFleur

This issue features articles about historical and contemporary weaving in Vestfoldsmett technique, a form of inlay or brocading woven in bands, from the area of Vestfold in Norway. 

As you read the articles, you will see these words many times: 

Vestfoldsmett: Vestfold inlay or brocading technique
Vestfoldteppe: Vestfold coverlet or weaving. Plural: Vestfoldtepper

Katherine Larson described the technique in her book, The Woven Coverlets of Norway (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001): 

The Vestfold coverlets, woven on a ground weave of weft-faced plain weave, contained brocading in two variations plus a supplementary weft patterning that traveled from selvage to selvage. Individual bobbins were used to create brocaded patterns in discrete portions of the weaving. In the first variation of this technique, often referred to in English by its Swedish name krabbasnår, patterns were built of constantly shifting horizontal lines. In the second variation known as halv-krabba, the pattern was composed of block-like shapes. The selvage-to-selvage patterning technique echoed the brocaded effect, with a supplementary pattern weft floating over and under a set number of warp threads across the width of the weaving. This fairly simple technique was sometimes combined with vertical stripes of pick-and-pick to create more detailed patterns. (See the full section on Vestfoldsmett from The Woven Coverlets of Norway here.)

Historical Vestfoldsmett still captivates contemporary weavers

click the image to see a pdf of the article in Norwegian, or read an English translation here.

In March, 2019, Nettverk Vev Vestfold (Vestfold Weaving Network) and the Holmestrand Husflidslag (Holmestrand Handcraft Organization) arranged a lecture on the history of Vestfoldtepper, along with a display of many hangings, runners, and pillows in vestfoldsmett. Over a hundred people came! (The reporter from the Jarlsberg newspaper added there was one man.) 

Weaving instructor Anne Grethe F. Barø was the speaker. Barø was also on the committee that gathered the history behind the 16 Vestfoldtepper that have been rediscovered. They are described in a new edition of the booklet Vestfoldteppene, with improved photos that show the details of each piece more clearly. 

Each old Vestfoldteppe has a discovery story

Sixteen Vestfoldsmett weavings in all have been located since the first two were exhibited in 1925, each with their own stories. For example, the thirteenth historical Vestfoldteppe came to light in 1991 when Anders Valumrød brought it to the attention of a local official, Astrid Vindvad. Laila Thorrud accompanied Vindvad to see the weaving in Vivistad, a parish in Tønsberg municipality in Vestfold. They were excited to see the worn and faded weaving was woven in Vestfoldsmett. 

 

The weaving had been in Valumrød’s family as long as he could remember. He inherited it from his mother, and family tradition was that it was woven by his great-grandmother, Karen Kristine Hansdatter Skorge (maiden name Kjerås, 1794-1863). She was married in 1819, so it stands to reason that it was woven sometime in the 1820s. It shares similar designs with other Vestfoldsmett weavings from around that time. 

It was a decorative textile to start, but its worn condition suggests the weaving might have been used for other purposes after its condition degraded. Colors faded and some of the dark areas completely disappeared. The black areas were likely dyed with gallepler [gall nuts, also known as oak apples or nutgalls], and over the years the tannic acid in them eroded the yarn. Happily, the family understood its value. 

In the end the historical coverlet was given to the Vestfold Fylkesmuseum, and in exchange the owners received a bright, newly-reconstructed replica, woven by Laila Thorrud. The worn coverlet underwent 140 hours of conservation, was thoroughly documented, and was moved to storage worthy of a cultural treasure—moth-free, dark, and temperature and humidity-controlled. 

Discover more about Vestfoldsmett

This issue started with a “Retro Reprint,” another in a series of articles published decades ago, when black-and-white print issues of the Norwegian Textile Letter were mailed to a small audience. Lila Nelson’s impeccably-researched article from 1999, “Vestfoldsmett–New Interest in an Old Technique,” now has color photos. “I’ve seen that pattern before,” you might realize after reading “Vestfoldteppene: Discovery, Documentation and Inspiration.” In “Symbolic Weaving from Vestfold,” the life cycle of wheat is described in the pattern bands of the Asketeppe. 

Largely due to the work of Lila Nelson, many American weavers became familiar with Vestfoldsmett. See their work in “Some Vestfold Weaving by Americans.” Finally, if you are a weaver inclined to try the technique yourself, check out “Vestfoldsmett–Weaving Tips and Technique.”

Sources: 

Livland, Haakon Graffer and Elin Halvorsen. Banken Hime: Bygd og Banken Gjennom 150 År. Andebu Sparebank, 2013. 

Graabæk, Elin. “Et Gammelt Vestfold-teppe, Anno 1991,” Vestfold Historielag, 1992. 

Larson, Katherine, The Woven Coverlets of Norway. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001. 

Vestfoldteppene. Tønsberg: Vestfold Husflidslag, 2001. This is not an instructional booklet, but it includes beautiful photos of the original and reconstructed Vestfoldtepper. A new edition was published in 2019. Limited copies will be available from the Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum Store. Email for information

The key words, once again

Vestfoldsmett: Vestfold inlay or brocading technique
Vestfoldteppe: Vestfold coverlet or weaving. Plural: Vestfoldtepper

 

Some Vestfold Weaving by Americans

By Robbie LaFleur

From the Scandinavian Weavers Study Group

Our Scandinavian Weavers Study Group of the Weavers Guild of Minnesota chooses one topic or technique or project each year. During the winter of 1997-98 we tried our hand at Vestfoldsmett. In the fall of 1998 a short exhibit was held in conjunction with the annual Federation Weaving Conference with work from seven weavers. Here are few of the Vestfoldsmett pieces that were displayed. 

Ann Haushild. 10″ x 29″ 

Janis Aune. 24″ x 47″

Robbie LaFleur experimented with Vestfoldsmett on a rag rug background.

Lila Nelson wove several pieces in Vestfoldsmett after her research in Norway. This one is 18.5″ x 31″.

Lila used Vestfoldsmett technique to weave birds. 16″ x 22″.

Lila Nelson wove an abstract piece in Vestfoldsmett. 15.5″ x 30″.

From the annual National Exhibition in the Norwegian Tradition from Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum

Melba Granlund’s piece in Vestfoldsmett won an Honorable Mention in the 33rd National Exhibition in 2014.

Helen Scherer, from Shawnee, KS, received an Honorable Mention in the 2017 Exhibition for “When I grow up, I want to be like the Døvleteppe!,”  a table runner in Vestfold technique.

This weaving in Vestfoldsmett by Robbie LaFleur won “Best of Show” at the National Exhibition in 2008.

The busy and compelling patterns of Vestfoldtepper have not just inspired weavers. Inspired by Katherine Larson’s book, The Woven Coverlets of Norway (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001), Merilee Thorstad from Frediric, Wisconsin, made a small replica (12″ x 18″) in cross-stitch. For the background colors of the bands, she hand-dyed embroidery canvas and sewed them together. It’s a sweet result! 

 

By Robbie LaFleur

The technique described 

In her pattern book, Tepper og Ryer i Vestfold: Mønsterhefte (Coverlets and Ryas in Vestfold: Pattern Book),1 Laila Emma Thorrud graphed the patterns for band designs from the historical Vestfoldtepper (Vestfold coverlets). The weaving instructions are not detailed, but one thing she makes clear is that Vestfoldsmett (Vestfold inlay) should be done from the wrong side. She even capitalizes it–VRANG

The originals are woven in two sections and sewn together. They are all without fringes. The technique has from 1925 been known as Vestfoldsmett in Norway. In Nordisk Textilteknisk Terminologi it is explained as broscherad tuskaft (embroidered two-shaft). That is to say we pick in the pattern figures on a flat warp with small pieces of yarn on the WRONG side and bind the pattern shot with two or more shots of plain weave. (Page 7, translation by Robbie LaFleur)

The Vestfoldsmett inlay technique is very similar to the Swedish art weave techniques krabbasnår and halv-krabba.

Vestfoldteppene,2 a booklet published by the Vestfold Husflidslag, describes the technique:

The technique has two formulations. In one, the pattern thread moves over one thread at a time, such that the pattern is created by connecting angled lines. It is clear that it is a line (snor) that crawls (krabber) upward. [hence, the Swedish word krabbesnår]. In the other technique, the pattern yarn goes over and under the same warp threads, such that the pattern is created by small squares that alternate. This is also called block-weaving. In the old coverlets the pattern threads passed over two warp threads on the right side. Because the weavers used varying reed sizes, the patterns varied in size among the coverlets. They used from 2-4 background shots between each pattern shot. The pattern threads are almost always doubled, and they are laid in on a closed shed. (Page 5, translation by Robbie LaFleur) 

This Vestfold pattern element includes both angled lines and alternating small blocks.

Advice from Minnesota weavers

The Scandinavian Weavers Study Group of the Weavers Guild of Minnesota tackled Vestfoldsmett as its annual study technique in 1997-98. Collectively, our group came up with a few hints for weaving Vestfoldsmett, based on our experiences.  Lila Nelson was a wonderful guide during our study, and many of the hints are hers.

Vestfold patterns by Ann Haushild. Photo: Ann Haushild

*  Do it right side up!  This was a consensus of the group, despite what purists might say.  It is much easier to see a mistake while weaving right side up, and to get a sense as the pattern develops.

*  You don’t need to use butterflies for the pattern threads: they can be a bit heavy and get tangled up.  Just using long sections of yarn is a good way to use up bits of leftovers.

*  Be sure to bubble the warp threads adequately.  If the sides pull in, you’ll have  more difficult time beating it in and covering the warp.

*  When striving for balance in a pattern, or repeating pattern bands throughout a piece, remember that it beats in like tapestry.  The patterns at the beginning of the weaving continue to get beaten.  In similar manner, remember that the patterns near the end may pack down less than the patterns at the beginning.

*  Tight tension is important.  Lila said, “When I do anything weft-faced I make the tension as tight as possible. When someone asked, “Why would the treads not beat in as well at the end, Lila suggested, “If the warp gets looser, it’s more difficult to beat it in.”

*  Don’t do it on a rigid heddle frame loom: it’s just too difficult to get and maintain nice, tight tension.

*  One member discovered that when she took a month off from weaving a Vestfold piece, the tension was different and made repeats of the patterns beat in differently.

*  Beware of making a long vertical design in only one area of the weaving, as the pattern threads may build up in those areas only and make covering the warp more difficult.  Strive for a balanced design across the warp.

*  Lila suggested the following materials:  12/6 fiskegarn as warp and Prydvevgarn for the weft, doubled for the pattern weave.  She suggested three shots of background between each pattern shot, although sometimes four shots may give the patterns a more squared appearance.

*  Should the back be finished?  If it’s beaten in well, you don’t have to finish or knot the ends.  However, while some original Vestfold weavings had threads left hanging on the back, Lila noted, “The messy appearance of the back seems un-Norwegian.”

*  All the group members admire Lila’s skills and experience, so it’s reassuring that she admits the technique can be tricky.  She said, “If I’m not careful, I can make some dumb mistakes.”

See also the “Weaving Technique” section of the article by Lila Nelson, “Vestfoldsmett: New Interest in an Old Technique.”

Sources

1Thorrud, Laila. Tepper og Ryer i Vestfold: Mønsterhefte (Coverlets and Ryas in Vestfold: Pattern Book). Tønsberg, Norway: Vestfold Historielag, 1992 In Norwegian. Limited copies will be available from the Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum Store. Email for information

2 Vestfoldteppene. Tønsberg: Vestfold Husflidslag, 2001. This booklet is not an instructional booklet, but includes beautiful photos of the original and reconstructed Vestfoldtepper. A new edition was published in 2019. Limited copies will be available from the Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum Store. Email for information

Retro Reprint: Vestfoldsmett–New Interest in an Old Technique

Editor’s note: This article originally appeared in Volume 5, No. 2, February 1999.  (Additional notes follow the article.)

Wall hanging in Vestfoldsmett woven by Lila Nelson. Owned by Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum

By Lila Nelson

A surprising variety of woven bed covers have been a part of the Norwegian folk tradition, but there is an equally surprising dearth of information about them.  Their origins, dates, history, the looms on which they were woven, sources of dyes, all are in many cases open to speculation. In fact, disagreement continues about whether some weaving was done by farm women or professionals and even if some types actually ever served as bed covers at all.

Vestfoldsmett is certainly a case in point. Ragnar Norby, in 1948 one of the first to write about the technique, stated that only 8 or 9 known examples exist and it appeared to be a local specialty.  Erling Eriksen’s 13-page monograph from 1955, which seems to be the major study extant, reveals how much is left to learn.  Former curator at the district museum in Tonsberg, he indicates that at an exhibition in 1925, when local people were invited to bring their family pieces, a Mrs. Meyer arrived with two coverlets in an unfamiliar technique.  Director Gulliksen asked the Norwegian Handcraft Association to make some copies and the discovery of more coverlets followed, thanks mainly to the interest and hard work of Ragnar Norby, who was a teacher in Larvik and a member of the Larvik Handcraft Association.

Where, Eriksen asks, did country weavers in Vestfold get the models for these unique tapestries?  Norby, Eriksen, and other Norwegian scholars argue that they derive from the Orient, possible based on the soumak technique; but how they got to Vestfold is unknown.  Some consider an impulse from Sweden, where a similar weave (krabbasnar) had tradition, though that, unlike Vestfoldsmett, often had a linen ground.  

Neither is there a solid basis for dating the coverlets since only one piece, from Svarstad, had the date 1840 actually woven in, and that is presumed to be the last one. The Kunstindustrimuseet example has a partially illegible date 17_2 which is interpreted as possible being 1762.  There seems to be a general acceptance of them having been produced in the 18th and 19th centuries, but proof is lacking.  Aase Bay Sjøvold, former textile curator at the Kunstindustrimuseet, speculates that various generations in just one family could have been responsible for the entire output; others say that the work has to have been done at least in part by professionals.

Eriksen points out that none of the coverlets seem to originate along the coast but rather are found inland in Vestfold.  He attributes this to economic factors, noting that the inner areas had wider economic distinctions and more defined economic classes.  Some farmers developed big farms and in addition made extra money by lumbering.  The landowners therefore had two sources of income while the non-landowners might in desperation turn to crafts such as weaving, especially since there was a wealthy class in a position to buy prestigious textiles. On the coastal areas, where farms were smaller and people were either farmers or fishermen, the economic distinctions were less extreme. People were generally satisfactorily situated but were not wealthy enough to be able to afford luxury textiles.  Eriksen, by these assumptions, reveals his belief that Vestfoldsmett were considered better than the everyday bed covers.

From my own examination of six Vestfold coverlets, however, I question that they were all made by professionals for a luxury class. One of them in particular shows the marks of an amateur weaver and several reveal casual and erratic methods of handling the loose pattern threads on the back side. I also wonder if they were not used quite steadily as functional coverlets because three or more show definite evidence along the sides of the wear that comes from frequent handling.  

Granting that the inland Vestfold areas were economically open to a weaving industry, this still does not tell us why this particular technique found favor there.  Similar questions apply to other areas of the country; for example, we can only speculate why Norwegian folk picture tapestries flourished in Gudbrandsdal and hardly anywhere else for over a hundred years in the 1600s and 1700s.  Neither does it tell us from where the style came and what influences were at work in its development.  

From the middle 1800s to around 1925, it appears that Vestfoldsmett was largely forgotten.  With its surfacing at the Tonsberg exhibition, it begins to show up in altered and greatly simplified forms on objects other than coverlets. It serves as decorative bands on the ends of table runners or in spots of decoration on pillows.  The results did not please Ragnar Nordby, who in his 1948 article describes them as a disaster. He calls for a return to the quality of the originals, but he is largely ignored.  Modern adaptations have continued to the present day.  

Graphed information for coverlets on which I have done sight examination

The name indicates where the coverlet was located, not necessarily where it was made.  The last listing relates to a coverlet now in the Kunstindustrimseet in Oslo;  The others are in the Tønsberg, Vestfold, museum.  

Dovleteppet (the word “teppet” is also used to mean “coverlet”)
Size: L 62 ½” W 52 ½”
Warp: 2-ply linen ca. 6.40 epi
Ground weft: ca. 7/2 2-ply wool
Pattern weft: ground used doubled. Some use thinner wool
Colors: white, gold-white, yellow, dk blue, lt blue, orange, red, lt beige, dk beige, black sheep,  dk green
No. bands: 10
Joining bands: diamond, arrow, zigzag inlays bordered by kjerringtenner
Center joining seam overcast with medium heavy linen
Sandar coverlet
Size: L 75 ½” W 55”
Warp: medium heavy 2-ply linen ca. 7 epi
Ground weft: medium heavy 2-ply wool
Pattern weft: ground used double
Colors: white gold, yellow-gold, dk blue, pink-beige, brown
No. bands: 12
Joining bands: three-thread floats with kjerringtenner
Center joining seam in running stitch with medium heavy linen
Stokke coverlet
Size: L 63” W 51”
Warp:2-ply linen ca. 6.40 epi
Ground weft: ca. 7/2,  2-ply wool
Pattern weft: ground used double
Colors: white, gold, grey-green, red, dk blue
No. bands:13
Joining bands: diamond, arrow inlay, kjeffingtenner
Center joining seam in running stitch with linen
Inscription: embroidered initials ITD
Andebu coverlet
Size:  L 63” W 53”
Warp: heavy 2-ply linen ca. 6.40 epi
Ground weft: heavy 2-ply wool, rya type
Pattern weft: ground used double, some thinner wool
Colors: white, gold, 2 shades green, rust, red, brown, dk blue
No. bands: 10
Joining bands: diamond, arrow, zigzag inlays, kjerringtenner
Center Joining seam in running stich with linen
AGD coverlet 
Size: L 64”  49½”
Warp: heavy 2-ply linen ca. 6.40 epi
Ground weft: medium heavy 2-ply wool
Pattern weft: ground used double, some use of single ply
Colors: medium gold, dk gold, reddish brown, dk blue, lt blue
No. bands: 11
Joining bands: diamond, arrow, zigzag inlays, kjerringtenner borders
Center joining seam not noted
Inscription: embroidered initials and date:
AG(?)D 17 (6?)2

This 1762 coverlet, the “Askjemteppet,” is owned by the Nasjonalmuseet (formerly the Kunstindustrimuseet). See the full record.

Seen only in Xeroxed photographs:

Sverstad coverlet (dated 1840)
Hoyjord coverlet
Solum coverlet (at Brekkemuseet)
Aske coverlet (privately owned)

Weaving Technique

As noted above, the warp is generally a heavy linen with a sett of 6.40 to 7 ends per inch.  The ground is tightly packed weft-faced plain weave.  All sources have taken for granted that the pattern was lain in on the loom, although Aase Bay Sjøvold points out that no one knows this for certain. There is, however, no extension of pattern threads going across the center joining seams, one indicator of embroidery.  It is also unlikely that thread-count embroidery would be attempted on a tightly packed wool foundation.

All directions state that the technique is done wrong side up using butterflies for the pattern wefts, but again there is no certain proof. In my own experiments, I have worked right side up using a straight length of weft instead of butterflies because 1) there is less chance of making an error, and easier to spot an error, and 2) it is preferable when weaving free rather than thread-counted designs and when other techniques are included.

Two shots of foundation weft appeared to be standard between each pattern inlay although I could not examine coverlets extensively enough to be sure this was constant. Most patterns floats were over two or over three warps.  Patterns requiring longer floats appeared to be done in increments of two or three. Although some sources indicate that longer floats were done in soumak or figure eight fashion, I could not in my cursory investigation see evidence of this.  It appeared that the weaver went over three warps, under two, and so on across the pattern area, then returning to fill in the previously uncovered warps. Any of the above three methods, however would seem to be workable and would look superficially similar when used, as in the case of Vestfoldsmett, in limited fashion.

Colors

As in aged textiles generally, colors have changed in varying degrees throughout the years, and one can sometimes only surmise what they originally were.  Some have faded to a rather non-identifiable grayed tone.  In 1979 Gunn Bremnes described tests she had made to determine the original colors of Dovleteppet and she concluded that they were natural white sheep, pale yellow, darker yellow, golden, orange, beige brown, sharp red, blue, and black.  (The colors in Dovleteppet are generally better preserved than in many of the other pieces.) I will not go into the detailed studies with indigo and various plant dyes which Bremnes carried out, but she points to what is evident in most of the coverlets, the predominance of shades of gold and yellow.  She mentions that birch trees, common in the area, were widely used to produce yellows.  Blues are next in importance, along with natural white and black.  Orange-red, pinkish beige and brownish-beige tones are also found, as is a grayed green.  Generally, one can say that the colors vary a good deal from one coverlet to another, as do the designs, making for a wide variety of effects.  Though the background color usually varies within each band of design, the Svarstad coverlet is said to be on an all-black ground.

Designs

All of the Vestfoldsmett coverlets have a series of horizontal bands, each with a different motif, the total number per coverlet varying from about 8 to 13.  These are separated by narrow bands which always include kjerringtenner (two colors alternating on plain weave to produce a toothed effect) and very often inlaid diamonds, arrow, or zigzag forms.  The total has been aptly described as continuously varied repetition.  Each band is filled with a horizontally repeated motif which is built up of floating pattern wefts.  The lines usually move diagonally by one or more threads as the pattern progresses, although some, especially the more geometric motifs, have three repeats before change, giving a block appearance.  Ragnar Norby classifies the major designs as being urns of flowers, and he calls attention to 14 patterns: five with constantly changing lines, five with a primarily block orientation, and four with elaborately ornamented variations.  Karin Archer stated that the Aske coverlet was described by its owner Martha Aske as symbolizing the story of life and growth in nature through stylized seeds, growing and blooming flowers, dancing figures, and rain.  Other sources, however, question a specific symbolic significance in the motifs.  

Bibliography

Andersen, Kirsten Gahrn.

RAMMEVAEV. G.E.C. Gads Forlag, Copenhagen, 1957. pp 42-51. In Danish.

Archer. Karin Fagerlund.  “De gamle Vestfoldteppene” in NORSK HUSFLID, No. 3, 1975. pp 8-10. In Norwegian.

1 This inlay technique has often been called “Vestfoldteknikk”, but that term could be applied to any woven product associated with the province of Vestfold; whereas “Vestfoldsmett”, so-called by Stromberg etal in their NORDISK TEAXTILTEKNISK TERMINOLOGI, refers specifically to an inlay process.  They classify it with the Swedish and Danish “krabbasnar”, the Icelandic “juoksupujotus”, defining them all as a folk type of two-harness brocade or in an older variant a brocade on a twill ground with double threads worked wrong side up.

2  Ragnar Norby.  “Vestfoldteppe” in Yrke, No. 2, 1948, pp 29-33.  He does not seem to be aware of one example in the Kunstindustrimuseet in Oslo, (Cat. No. 3781), which I saw in 1984.

3 Erling Eriksen. “Gammel vevkunst i Vestfolds bygder” in Vestfold Minne 1955. Translated by Torun Gulliksen 1983.

4 Karin Archer. “De gamle Vestfold Teppene” in Husflid, No. 3, 1975. Archer refers to the unmarried Meyer sisters from Nøtteroy.

5 Gunn Bremnes. “Om fargebruk i “Dovle-teppet” in Vestfold Minne 1979. pp. 30-34. Translated by Torun Gulliksen.

Lila Nelson was an excellent researcher. Her descriptions of the coverlets she included were based on personal examination. There were no photos of the pieces she examined in the original article, but I felt confident that the photos included in this reprint are the correct ones, based on the photos and descriptions in the booklet, Vestfoldteppene, published by the Vestfold Husflidlag. The Vestfoldteppe images are all from digitaltmuseet.no. I eliminated one description which I could not definitively match to an original coverlet in a photo. Robbie LaFleur

Symbolic Weaving from Vestfold

By Robbie LaFleur

Vestfold shown in red

Sixteen historical coverlets from the region of Vestfold in Norway are symbolic in two ways. First, the intricate bands of pattern woven in Vestfoldsmett inlay technique contain symbols. The Vestfoldtepper (Vestfold coverlets) were woven between 1708 and the mid-1800s. More recently, the weavings themselves have become important cultural symbols of the region. 

When King Harald and Queen Sylvia visited Vestfold in 2012, they were presented with a Vestfoldteppe reproduction woven by Laila Thorrud, a copy of the Døvleteppe. A press release about the royal visit to Andebu described the weaving: “The Døvleteppet has characteristic broad stripes with different background colors and a pattern in each stripe. Hidden in the patterns are symbols and messages. A square represents the four corners of the earth, which symbolizes that God is God for everyone. The Døvleteppe has woven squares with crosses. Grape clusters reference grapes at the holy table–that is, wine. The zigzag borders are lightning or rainbows.”

The original Døvleteppet. Details from digitaltmuseum.no

 A Harvest Celebration with a Vestfoldteppe

The “Asketeppe” is one of the sixteen historical Vestfoldtepper that have been discovered in the Vestfold area. It was named after the Aske farm in Brunlanes, but originated in Kjose, an inland village near Larvik. It was woven around 1800 and first displayed publicly in 1938.

In 2018 the the Hillestad Bygdekvinnelag (a regional women’s group) used a reproduction Asketeppe as the centerpiece of a Thanksgiving celebration at Hillestad Church. Marianne Løchen, head of the group, purchased the Asketeppe on the Norwegian auction site, finn.no (inexpensively, she noted). 

Pastor Beint Saaghus presided on the festival day, and she was given a list of the symbols depicted in the bands, perfect for a celebration of harvest.

  1. (black background) Grain planted in the field.
  2. (green background) The grain is sprouting.
  3. (red background) Winter rye is sprouting in the spring.
  4. (black background) Grain is flowering.
  5. (red background) Grain sets its heads.
  6. (dark blue background) Kernels grow in the heads. 
  7. (green background) Grain is sprouting and growing. 
  8. (blue background) Flowers.
  9. (red background) The grain heads out. The small dots are bees flying around.
  10. (green background) Urn figures and candleholders symbolize the harvest.
  11. (white background) This area symbolizes the sky with rainbows.
  12. (black background) The starry sky surrounds the earth.

Ingvild Stomsvik and Marianne Løchen at the Hillestad Church celebration. After the service, they served traditional Kjærlighetssuppe (love-soup). 

The Asketeppe must be a popular pattern; it was chosen as the image for an ad for Vestfoldteppe patterns. The ad reads, “In Vestfold we have a weaving technique known as Vestfoldsmett. Vestfold Husflidslag has created patterns for 13 coverlets and one runner. They are created from originals from all of Vestfold. You can purchase patterns and specially-dyed yarn from the three Husflid shops in Vestfold.”

Vestfoldtepper are historical regional textiles that are still celebrated today. If you visit Vestfold in the future, keep an eye out–you’ll likely spot a weaving with the popular Vestfoldsmett technique.

 

Vestfoldteppene: Discovery, Documentation and Inspiration

By Robbie LaFleur

A long time ago (as many good folk tales begin), in the area of Norway known as Vestfold, clever weavers created bright banded wool weavings known as Vestfoldtepper (Vestfold coverlets). On large wooden looms in the 1700s and 1800s they wove patterns and symbols in a brocaded inlay technique, Vestfoldsmett (Vestfold inlay or Vestfold brocading). You can imagine the impact of a large swath of color in the interior of a Norwegian home during dark winter months. This reconstructed Vestfoldteppe has colors as warm as the fire in the hearth. 

Reconstruction woven by Laila Thorrud in 1991. Owned by Kommandør Chr. Christensens Hvalfangstmuseum. Photo: Mekonnen Wolday. Details at digitaltmuseum.no.

In 1925, two old coverlets in Vestfoldsmett were displayed publicly and sparked great interest. Within ten years, 8 more of the banded weavings with embroidery-like inlay were discovered. Nearly a century later, 16 have turned up. Vestfoldteppene, a booklet published by the Vestfold Husflidslag (2001, updated 2019), includes history and photos of the Vestfoldsmett textile treasures discovered and documented since 1925. A photo of each worn and faded coverlet is accompanied by a modern reproduction.

A page-spread example of the juxtaposition of old and new Vestfoldtepper.

The discovery of these distinctive weavings excited historians, and weavers were intrigued by the technique. The Husflid (Handcraft Organization) in Oslo published patterns. You could rent a pattern for 2 kroner for four days, or if you were weaving for sale it would cost five kroner.1 

Interest in weaving Vestfoldsmett spread around Norway, for hangings, runners and pillows. Runners produced for tourist trade were especially popular and typically included bands of Vestfold pattern combined with rosepath on each end, with plain weave in the center section. When weaving for sale, it would have been too time-consuming to weave in Vestfoldsmett over the whole piece. 

Several pieces in Vestfoldsmett have been donated to Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum in Decorah, Iowa, likely purchased by the owners on trips to Norway. This runner is woven in colors popular in the 20th century: rust, green, sheep-black, and gold.

Vesterheim Artifact #: 1985.101.021.JPG

The Vestfold runners in shops were made by women in home studios. From Vestfoldteppene:

There was great interest in weavings with Vestfold inlay. This gave many women an opportunity to earn some extra kroner. Many weaving studios started up around the country. One weaver said that in the 1940s a weaver could earn about 500 kroner a month weaving Vestfold runners.  That was good pay, given the cost of living. She wove from 7 am to 2 pm, and could weave two runners in that time. 

Two more runners in the Vesterheim collection have the same color palette, but slightly different patterns. 

Vesterheim artifact #: 1986.122.009

Vesterheim artifact #: 1996.103.001

The designer Else Poulsson, as head of the Husflid organization, was responsible for designing new patterns using Vestfoldsmett. She incorporated traditional designs from the bands of the old coverlets, as in the runners shown above. She also used the inlay technique for more modern designs, like these.

Pillow top designed by Else Poulsson, Model 7084, owned by the Norsk Folkemuseum. Details from digitaltmuseet.no

A pillow top designed by Else Poulsson, Model 1480, owned by the Norsk Folkemuseum. Details from digitaltmuseet.no

Table runners with Vestfoldsmett are still sold in Norway as tourist items. In 2011 the Vesterheim Textile tour to Norway included a stop at the flagship store of Audhild Viken in stunningly beautiful Skei, Norway, north of Bergen.  Stacks of runners were folded on display tables. 

Photo: Robbie LaFleur

Shortly after World War II, at a time when many Norwegians were losing interest in traditional textiles and wanted modern pieces, Audhild Viken began a weaving workshop to preserve the old textile traditions and to sell them.  She began by selling weavings from her bicycle, and her son continued the tradition by selling from a moped and then a car.  The business grew tremendously and in the 1960s she employed over 200 weavers, mostly providing piecework.  Now Audhild Viken is the name of several high-end souvenir shops around Norway. (I don’t know where these new models are woven.)

After seeing the historical Vestfold pieces and the weavings they inspired in Norway in the following decades, you might start recognizing Vestfoldsmett in museums or antique shops. A recent search in the Norwegian auction site, finn.no, turned up several available pieces. This nice runner was available for $43–you can’t buy the Norwegian yarn for that price! Or perhaps it’s time to weave your own piece in Vestfoldsmett, inspired by the vibrant designs and deep history of this historical technique. 

Viewed on the finn.no auction site on February 13, 2021.

According to the Vestfoldteppene booklet, the patterns were designed by Else Poulsson. Poulsson was a designer and head of the textile division at Den Norske Husflidsforening (the Norwegian Handcraft Association) from 1929-1954, so this was likely in the 1930s or 1940s.

Source:

Vestfoldteppene. Tønsberg: Vestfold Husflidslag, 2001. This is not an instructional booklet, but it includes beautiful photos of the original and reconstructed Vestfoldtepper. A new edition was published in 2019. Limited copies will be available from the Vesterheim Norwegian-American Museum Store. Email for information